The authors regret for the mistake occurred in the Highlights during the final editing process reporting for Drosophila suzukii a negative chemotaxis to ammonia volatiles. This response was observed in Drosophila melanogaster, while no significant response to ammonia volatiles was observed in Drosophila suzukii in the chemotaxis assay. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused
The sentence on page 1350 should have appeared as, “However, the level of silent polymorphism is not...
The authors would like to acknowledge that the article contains overlap in text with that from our p...
The authors regret the indication on the scale bars in each Figure was not reported in the published...
The authors regret for the mistake occurred in the Highlights during the final editing process repor...
The authors regret . The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused
The authors regret . The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused
The authors regret . The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused
The authors regret the incorrect publication of the name of the co-author ‘Veedamali S Subramanian’ ...
The authors regret that there was an error in the illustration of the results of the total protein a...
The authors regret that there was an error in the illustration of the results of the total protein a...
In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 1 and Table 2 as published. The Table 1 and Ta...
In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 1 and Table 2 as published. The Table 1 and Ta...
The authors regret the indication on the scale bars in each Figure was not reported in the published...
The authors regret the indication on the scale bars in each Figure was not reported in the published...
The authors regret the indication on the scale bars in each Figure was not reported in the published...
The sentence on page 1350 should have appeared as, “However, the level of silent polymorphism is not...
The authors would like to acknowledge that the article contains overlap in text with that from our p...
The authors regret the indication on the scale bars in each Figure was not reported in the published...
The authors regret for the mistake occurred in the Highlights during the final editing process repor...
The authors regret . The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused
The authors regret . The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused
The authors regret . The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused
The authors regret the incorrect publication of the name of the co-author ‘Veedamali S Subramanian’ ...
The authors regret that there was an error in the illustration of the results of the total protein a...
The authors regret that there was an error in the illustration of the results of the total protein a...
In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 1 and Table 2 as published. The Table 1 and Ta...
In the original article, there was a mistake in Table 1 and Table 2 as published. The Table 1 and Ta...
The authors regret the indication on the scale bars in each Figure was not reported in the published...
The authors regret the indication on the scale bars in each Figure was not reported in the published...
The authors regret the indication on the scale bars in each Figure was not reported in the published...
The sentence on page 1350 should have appeared as, “However, the level of silent polymorphism is not...
The authors would like to acknowledge that the article contains overlap in text with that from our p...
The authors regret the indication on the scale bars in each Figure was not reported in the published...